Why “high tolerance of ambiguity” should anchor your creative toolkit
Creative thinkers are unafraid of the ambiguous spaces where innovation often resides — and this trait is vital when navigating change.
Excerpted from The Art of Change: Transforming Paradoxes into Breakthroughs by permission from Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
By Jeff DeGraff
The paradoxical mindset is the cornerstone of change and innovation. Organizations that aim to be at the forefront of innovation need to foster environments that encourage this mindset, allowing for a fluid and flexible approach to new ideas and challenges. This adaptability is particularly crucial in our rapidly evolving technological landscape. The innovation process itself sets up a dynamic interplay between concrete experiences and abstract conceptualization, necessitating a blend of reflective observation and active experimentation. Here, the paradoxical mindset becomes indispensable, enabling you to navigate diverse modes of thinking and learning.
The paradoxical mindset becomes even more essential in developing a thriving team dynamics. In situations where the goals are somewhat ambiguous and complex, teams that encompass a variety of learning styles tend to outperform more homogenous groups. This diversity is a catalyst for innovation, as it brings together different perspectives and problem-solving approaches. However, it also increases the difficulties in managing conflicts effectively. In innovation, managing conflicts does not mean avoiding or resolving disagreements quickly to move on. Instead, it means transforming those differences into opportunities for growth and innovation. Moreover, it is crucial for team leaders to understand and accommodate the diverse learning styles of team members, producing an open and safe environment, robust discussions, and an inclusive process.
Furthermore, the importance of a paradoxical mindset extends to the observational research necessary for understanding user needs and context. In the innovation process, a deep and nuanced understanding of these elements comes through careful observation and analysis of complex information. A paradoxical mindset is vital here, allowing for a flexible and open approach to interpreting diverse data and insights.
In the quest to stimulate profound and expansive thinking among students and adherents, educators and guides often employ intriguing elements such as the liar paradox: “Everyone is a liar.” Statements like these are intentionally paradoxical and philosophical, aimed at prompting individuals to contemplate the inherent contradictions and complexities within them.
Rather than being unsolvable conundrums, these questions serve as deliberate paradoxes. They act as mirrors, encouraging individuals to turn their focus inward, to engage in a deeper exploration of their own cognitive processes. In essence, they are self-referential tools designed to disrupt the inertia of simplistic, habit-bound thinking. The goal is to encourage the development of a more mindful and adaptable perspective, one that entertains a wider range of responses and actions.
By delving into these kinds of paradoxes, teachers and guides aspire to nurture a heightened awareness of paradox as a concept. This awareness, in turn, inspires pupils and adherents to transcend the confines of conventional thought and embrace the intricate world of paradoxical ideas and actions. It is through the exploration of these enigmatic questions that individuals can embark on a journey toward greater intellectual depth and broader horizons of understanding.
As you navigate the complexities of change, certain traits stand out as beacons, guiding you toward success in both personal and professional realms. Drawing from the insights of E. Paul Torrance (1974, 1987) and E. O. Wilson (2017), pioneers in the field of creative thinking, we can identify these key traits. Their research not only highlights the characteristics of highly creative individuals but also offers a valuable framework for understanding how these traits intertwine with adaptability, providing guidance for personal and professional growth.
The implicit trait of both creative and paradoxical thinkers, a high tolerance of ambiguity, stands as a foundational pillar in these creative individuals’ arsenal. This trait reflects their comfort with uncertainty and their ability to remain composed and decisive in situations where information is incomplete or outcomes are unpredictable. Creative thinkers explore uncharted territories of imagination through their tolerance of ambiguity. When faced with unclear paths or undefined parameters, they do not shy away but rather embrace the opportunity to delve into the unknown. This tolerance allows them to navigate through creative processes with fluidity, unafraid of the ambiguous spaces where innovation often resides. In art, for example, artists frequently confront ambiguity as they seek to convey complex emotions or abstract concepts, using that ambiguity as a catalyst for creative expression and exploration.
Similarly, paradoxical thinkers leverage their high tolerance of ambiguity to navigate the complexities of change. In dynamic environments where circumstances are constantly shifting, they remain unfazed by uncertainty and ambiguity, embracing them as opportunities for growth and adaptation. Whether in business, where market conditions are unpredictable, or in personal life, where unexpected challenges arise, paradoxical thinkers approach ambiguity with resilience and adaptability, seeking solutions amid the flux.
Ultimately, the tolerance of ambiguity serves as a catalyst for innovation and adaptation, enabling creative and paradoxical thinkers to thrive in environments characterized by rapid change and complexity.
The tolerance of ambiguity fosters a flexible and open-minded approach crucial for both creative and paradoxical thinkers. It enables them to explore diverse possibilities, entertain conflicting ideas, and make well-reasoned decisions even in the absence of complete information. Individuals with a high tolerance of ambiguity are less likely to experience stress in uncertain scenarios and are more open to a range of possibilities, making them adept at navigating through complex and ambiguous situations.
Ultimately, the tolerance of ambiguity serves as a catalyst for innovation and adaptation, enabling creative and paradoxical thinkers to thrive in environments characterized by rapid change and complexity. By embracing ambiguity, they unlock new avenues for exploration, discovery, and transformation, fueling their journey toward creative expression and adaptive success.
Check out more of Big Think’s content:
Big Think | Mini Philosophy | Starts with a Bang | Big Think Books
This immediately brought to mind the psychology concept of intolerance of uncertainty (IU), which has been linked to anxiety for decades but more recently to autism. The paradox for autism is that, although autistic people tend to prefer routine and familiarity, there's also the well-documented special interest phenomenon, where autistic people engage in intellectual pursuits with deep, compulsive focus. I'm starting to wonder if the twin of IU is a a desire to dispel uncertainty through intellectual discovery -- in other words, that disliking uncertainty can fuel curiosity, if that curiosity is calculated to render the unknown, known. Anyway, interesting to consider different models of how creativity/innovation might work.